3 ms·
10% slower is actually not that bad, when compared to the safety and portability not given by C/C++. Past 10% performance parity is the stuff of performance op
by mises 7y ago
10% slower is actually not that bad, when compared to the safety and portability not given by C/C++. Past 10% performance parity is the stuff of performance optimization challenges; we may have to accept that.
We're all putting up with regular 10% drops in our CPU performance because intel was stupid about alot of things; maybe we could give 10% up for common applications (let's face it, most aren't CPU-bound) having more safety.
Of course, I don't know if wasm is the answer. Jury's still out for whether it's great in native or not; honestly, GUI is still the issue.