5 ms·
I once had a boss who was an old Cobol Cowboy, he walked me through a financial system that's still in use. I can't help but feel that even back in the days, t
by codr7 7y ago
I once had a boss who was an old Cobol Cowboy, he walked me through a financial system that's still in use.
I can't help but feel that even back in the days, they would have been better served by Pascal with fix point math. The only convenient features I could spot were related to working with records in files, and Pascal has that covered.
Their Cobol implementation sort of, kind of supported subroutines but they were such a pain in the ass that code was usually copy-pasted instead.
The only thing about Cobol that I just can't stand so far is the optional filler "keywords" that allows code to look sort of, kind of like natural language. That's just wrong.
- kragen 7y agoWhen Pascal was published in 1970, COBOL was already 11 years old.
- codr7 7y agoI am aware, Cobol wasn't standardized until 1970 though. My point is that if you can implement Cobol, you can implement Pascal; and your users will be better off. Cobol has no inherent qualities from my experience that makes it a better choice.