Thanks. Here are my comments as I read all 3 parts: Part 1: Re-iterates what I've said in this thread before. No safety concerns. Correctly cites scientific so

Thanks. Here are my comments as I read all 3 parts: Part 1: Re-iterates what I've said in this thread before. No safety concerns. Correctly cites scientific sources to back up claims. Part 2: Citation [1] referenced in blog is not consistent with 5G frequencies. (Limited) measurements and simulations are performed at 380 GHz, while 5G is <300 GHz. Citation [2] in the blog doesn't make the conclusion that the blogger thinks (scientists say: "Perhaps, MMW has bactericidal and the other actions, leading to a change in characteristics and metabolic pathways in bacteria and to their antibiotic resistance.", blogger says "study found that mmWaves altered bacteria growth". All further conclusions are based on flawed interpretations of these 2 articles. Part 3: Opinion piece to "stop 5G until it is proven harmless". Well, that's the end of everything then. Since proving a negative is impossible we can never do anything new ...? [1] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8016593 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8016593 [2] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-016-7538-0 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-016-7538-0