3 ms·
I don't think it would have been a hassle for him specifically (could always just ctrl/cmd + f....), he's moreso lamenting the fact that this is an actual featu
by nexuist 7y ago
I don't think it would have been a hassle for him specifically (could always just ctrl/cmd + f....), he's moreso lamenting the fact that this is an actual feature i.e., if you actually wanted to program in COBOL for some reason you'd actually have to deal with this, which makes its inclusion insane.
- hermitdev 7y agoYeah, it wasn't an issue of doing CTRL-F, it was about making sense of that flow when the control jumps you multiple screens of code. The problem isn't finding the destination, its what alternately happened been source and destination. Also, if your reading on paper, CTRL-F isn't available. You're scanning those pages by hand. When you're sitting there, highlighter and pen in hand to make annotations and point out important shit, its a problem. End up with circles around the periods and arrows point to it with comments like "this is how we got to x from y." Edit: also if you end up at the same place regardless of the source or from multiple sources. You can't keep the code for a level to find everywhere a jump emds up there.