This work is a fallout of the conclusion of this report: https://www.internetgovernance.org/2019/02/20/report-on-ipv6-get-ready-for-a-mixed-internet-world/ htt

This work is a fallout of the conclusion of this report: https://www.internetgovernance.org/2019/02/20/report-on-ipv6-get-ready-for-a-mixed-internet-world/ https://www.internetgovernance.org/2019/02/20/report-on-ipv6... "legacy IPv4 will coexist with IPv6 indefinitely" which was referenced in the original talk, and I wish more "just deploy ipv6" advocates would read. I have worked very hard on making ipv6 deployable (notably in the cerowrt project) and came to the conclusion after reading that that if we wanted sustained internet innovation we needed to expand and improve ipv4, also. Thus 240/4, 0/8, 225/8-231/8 (pending) and yes, even a large portion of 127 and a push to clean up other problems in ipv4 in general.