4 ms·
Los Angeles has mostly inspection based fare enforcement and it looks like ~5% evasion rate. Doesn't seem too bad for higher throughput. http://metro.legistar1
by mayneack 7y ago
Los Angeles has mostly inspection based fare enforcement and it looks like ~5% evasion rate. Doesn't seem too bad for higher throughput.
http://metro.legistar1.com/metro/attachments/94807457-8593-4f7c-a336-7c5180f96f9a.pdf http://metro.legistar1.com/metro/attachments/94807457-8593-4...
- beowulfey 7y agoActually LA metro switched to faregates everywhere a few years ago. Busses still have some hopons though
- dahdum 7y agoSeems a bit higher than that on average, Dec/Jan were ~8.3%. Faregates are rarely the rate limiter on throughput (buses moreso than others though). Adding more cuts enforcement labor and increases revenue.
- bobthepanda 7y agoThere's a not-insignificant capital cost (faregates need electric and networking), and some users cannot be accommodated with faregates at all, necessitating station agents to let them in through an emergency exit or some other means of ingress.
- riffic 7y agoThe enforcement you refer to is not universal or uniform in nature.