5 ms·

It's also worth remembering that innovations in manufacturing are quite often 'short cuts' that have the same or better result with less process.

SEJeff 7y ago
Agreed. I do wonder why people are downvoting me for pointing out the truth though. Breach of a legally binding contract is grounds for a civil lawsuit. This is how the country works!
- bogonic 7y ago
  I wonder why you can't understand that actions have consequences; and that if a company sues employees who resort to an external escalation path to address problems, that some customers will dislike and distrust that company in the future.
  - SEJeff 7y ago
    I never said any of that, and am assuming you signed up for this throw away assuming I'd downvote you, or you're afraid of using your real account for some stupid reason? I said simply that if someone signs a legal contract and one side breaks it, the other party is well within their bounds to investigate it and potentially to litigate it as well. This is how contracts work unless they're deemed to break a law. Then a judge will invalidate it. Do I think suing employees is good for business, or for a public image? No, I think it is terrible. You're the one who tried to put words into my mouth I never once stated.
    - bogonic 7y ago
      You asked, and I quote: "Why wouldn't they go after someone breaching their NDA?" If this was a rhetorical assertion that there is no reason for Tesla not to sue, then you should admit that you took the position that I described, you should stop pretending that I put words in your mouth, and you should apologize to me for your feigned outrage. If you were actually asking why Tesla wouldn't use every legal tool available to them, then you should thank me for providing you with a thoughtful answer, and then apologize for attacking me and my character. I eagerly await your sincere apology.
      - SEJeff 7y ago
        You did an excellent job beating up that strawman, but I'm not biting. I'm just amused you had to use a throw away to do it. Why not use your main?

SEJeff 7y ago

Agreed. I do wonder why people are downvoting me for pointing out the truth though. Breach of a legally binding contract is grounds for a civil lawsuit. This is how the country works!

bogonic 7y ago
I wonder why you can't understand that actions have consequences; and that if a company sues employees who resort to an external escalation path to address problems, that some customers will dislike and distrust that company in the future.
- SEJeff 7y ago
  I never said any of that, and am assuming you signed up for this throw away assuming I'd downvote you, or you're afraid of using your real account for some stupid reason? I said simply that if someone signs a legal contract and one side breaks it, the other party is well within their bounds to investigate it and potentially to litigate it as well. This is how contracts work unless they're deemed to break a law. Then a judge will invalidate it. Do I think suing employees is good for business, or for a public image? No, I think it is terrible. You're the one who tried to put words into my mouth I never once stated.
  - bogonic 7y ago
    You asked, and I quote: "Why wouldn't they go after someone breaching their NDA?" If this was a rhetorical assertion that there is no reason for Tesla not to sue, then you should admit that you took the position that I described, you should stop pretending that I put words in your mouth, and you should apologize to me for your feigned outrage. If you were actually asking why Tesla wouldn't use every legal tool available to them, then you should thank me for providing you with a thoughtful answer, and then apologize for attacking me and my character. I eagerly await your sincere apology.
    - SEJeff 7y ago
      You did an excellent job beating up that strawman, but I'm not biting. I'm just amused you had to use a throw away to do it. Why not use your main?