4 ms·
I'll bite: People should be allowed to modify their property, including what runs on their computer.
by lemagedurage 7y ago
I'll bite:
People should be allowed to modify their property, including what runs on their computer.
- Legogris 7y agoThat people should not be forbidden to modify what's running on their computer does not morally justify any code you may be running on your computer. Try to separate ethics and morality from rights.
- papermachete 7y agoSurely if they didn't mind people blocking ads, they would add DRM and doubly/triply encrypt every data the app accesses/serves. As it is, they decided ads are just extra content you can strip away from your songs.
- Legogris 7y agoI do not see that as a legit moral justification. Not saying I do think it's morally wrong, just that these are beside the point.
- papermachete 7y agoHaving a hard time understanding your moral compass. Do you find it wrong that a userspace program is manipulated by the kernel? Do you think it's unfair because this may or may not devaluate ads?
- Legogris 7y agoWhat I think on that issue has nothing to do with my argument that "People should be allowed to modify their property, including what runs on their computer" is orthogonal to whether it's morally justified to run any kind of software of your computer. Is running a spam bot PMing suicide threats to people also justified with this logic?