> What needs to be shown is a set of problems that can adequately be solved by racket that cannot be solved as well with competing languages I thought the piec

> What needs to be shown is a set of problems that can adequately be solved by racket that cannot be solved as well with competing languages I thought the piece "Why Language-Oriented Programming? Why Racket?" covered that question pretty well. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19232068 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19232068 Perhaps there's another modern programming language that can do these things as easily as Racket. I haven't come across it, however.