9 ms·
Yes, because Amazon would no longer exist.
by akavi 7y ago
Yes, because Amazon would no longer exist.
- mikeash 7y agoWhy?
- tptacek 7y agoBecause they will lose money, since their margins are already very slim now with at their current labor cost.
- mikeash 7y agoI am saying that they could use some of their approximately $10^10 yearly profits to pay people better. How would that cause them to lose money?
- tptacek 7y agoThey could indeed use their other businesses to fund running their retail/fulfillment business at a loss. But at that point it would be just as rational to jettison those businesses (by spinning them off into another company), and now we're a step behind square one: they lose whatever economies they get from being a single company, their cost basis gets worse, and they're in an even poorer position to pay more. These are descriptive, not normative, observations.
- mikeash 7y agoIt's also a descriptive observation that they can afford to pay more without destroying the company. Whether they should is a separate question I haven't even attempted to address.
- tptacek 7y agoI'm not saying they shouldn't, only that it doesn't follow from the economics of their retail/fulfillment business (to which those employees belong) that they rationally can.