> This is a standard tactic for companies who don't want a bill to pass, but also don't want to get attacked for opposing it. I don't think that's true. The st

> This is a standard tactic for companies who don't want a bill to pass, but also don't want to get attacked for opposing it. I don't think that's true. The standard tactic is to support a bill that has no teeth and/or imposes a significant "floor" cost such that complying with the regulation is a large proportion revenue for small companies but a very small proportion to large, established companies, thus preventing potential small/new competitors from establishing a foothold.