Sorry, please explain to me if my interpretation is correct: 1. The cost of a false positive is low. 1a. The cost of a false positive is retesting (what is ret

Sorry, please explain to me if my interpretation is correct: 1. The cost of a false positive is low. 1a. The cost of a false positive is retesting (what is retesting? Re-mammogramming? Isn't healthcare in USA expensive?) 1b. Observe (so future re-mammogramming and hypervigilance). 2. Additional to the cost of 1a and 1b, cease consuming sugar. Which is a non-insignificant lifestyle change. What I'm saying is... the statements "Rerun expensive tests and maintain hypervigilance seems like a low cost, in addition to major lifestyle changes that affect every level of one's socioeconomic place (eating out with friends/family, cost of food, food availability, habit breaking, possibly culture clashes, etc)." seems pretty much equivalent to absolute nonsense.