3 ms·
Isn't it a fact that software engineering is inherently creative? While programming may not strictly count as art by most people's definitions, it is certainly
by EForEndeavour 7y ago
Isn't it a fact that software engineering is inherently creative? While programming may not strictly count as art by most people's definitions, it is certainly not soulless or mechanical as your comment implies. In particular, Bach's music is so remarkable precisely because it combines mathematical patterns and subjective beauty.
I hate the phrase, but exceptional software engineers "paint with code."
- davidjnelson 7y ago> Isn't it a fact that software engineering is inherently creative? Yes, absolutely. If you can create a simple, clean, extensible abstraction that hundreds of other engineers use to avoid recreating and testing functionality this could be considered 10x due to the leverage.
- cmiles74 7y agoI agree that software development is creative, I do think that's an important part of the process. I'm not convinced that every "10x developer" is solving software engineering problems on the same level at which Rembrandt painted or Bach composed. It seems to me that painters and composers create art that is appreciated much more widely and over a much more varied audience than software engineers. Given that the inner workings of software are visible to a much smaller audience, isn't it likely that their skills are being over-rated?
- pizza234 7y ago> I'm not convinced that every "10x developer" is solving software engineering problems on the same level at which Rembrandt painted or Bach composed I think "10x developer" is a very ambiguous definition, and comparisons in other fields are confused because of this. I'd rather use the adjective "elite". It's more intuitive and unambiguous. Carmack is without doubt an elite engineer; his work, in my opinion, is on the same level as Bach's in his field.
- EForEndeavour 7y agoThere certainly exist developers who perform at the same level in their craft as Bach composed. Why wouldn't the positive tail of the distribution exist?