>Despite it being off topic, can we define why those claims are questionable? the claims are questionable because his methodology is questionable. If he claims

>Despite it being off topic, can we define why those claims are questionable? the claims are questionable because his methodology is questionable. If he claims google is biased, he should have a good peer reviewable study that proves this..not google is biased because google didn't auto prompt me with "created AIDS" when I typed in hillary Clinton.... And he's the one making the claim that google is biased...The burden of proof is on HIM. This is a forum for people in the tech world, right? Shouldn't we question N=1 "studies"?