5 ms·

Show HN: Add an always-on video hangout to your Slack channel

52 points by drpancake 7y ago

bartproost 7y ago
Played my first lead role in the demo video of this. Hollywood here I come!
- catacombs 7y ago
  Thank drpancake in your Oscar speech.
tonixx 7y ago
I like it! Congrats!
ZitchDog 7y ago
I started building this last night, can't wait to try it out - hopefully I can stop building it :)
- deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]
ryanmaynard 7y ago
This is interesting. Any hint at what the pricing model will be? I'm not seeing anything.
- drpancake 7y ago
  The plan is to keep the current functionality free and add premium features for remote teams in the future.
edoceo 7y ago
Awesome, I've been doing an audio-only one (and away from Slack)
robbiemitchell 7y ago
I think about this all the time and was sad to see Sqwiggle die -- excited to see this evolve. A couple quick thoughts: - What's it like to be in two channels attempting to have a "meeting"? Seems like that will get confusing quickly. - Consider an idle state where a snapshot is posted every so often (~once/minute) until people switch to an active discussion. That way you can see who's around with way less bandwidth.
- drpancake 7y ago
  Yes it does allow you to open multiple channels at the same time. I don't know how useful that is, but I'd like to see how people actually use it before jumping to my own conclusions. The idle state is definitely something I'm considering for bandwidth and privacy reasons. Sqwiggle (now defunct) did this quite well. I'm also thinking about adding a way to pixelate or blur your feed while still remaining 'present'.
nottorp 7y ago
Now I get why everyone's complaining that Slack is hindering their work ;)
djsumdog 7y ago
At first I thought this was going to be a room where it always had everyone's videos and you could see all your remote workers and I was like "...creepy...and no..." I guess that could be a use case, but it's much simpler than that. Seems pretty neat.
- pavel_lishin 7y ago
  Something like that would be tremendously useful when you're one person who's WFH. It would be nice to take a glance at the office webcam, and see if my coworkers are actually at their desks before pinging them a question - otherwise, I'm not sure if they're about to respond, or busy away from their desk, etc.
  - drpancake 7y ago
    Could you imagine using the current feature set to do this? Is there anything missing?
    - pavel_lishin 7y ago
      I think you'd have to have a dedicated machine with a camera for this; otherwise, you'd have to ask one of your coworkers to basically be constantly on-camera for you. That's not a limitation of the service, though.
- drpancake 7y ago
  Right, there are a number of tools like that including the (now defunct) Sqwiggle. My goal was to create something simple to fit a few use cases and see what people do with it.

52 points by drpancake 7y ago

bartproost 7y ago

Played my first lead role in the demo video of this. Hollywood here I come!

catacombs 7y ago
Thank drpancake in your Oscar speech.

tonixx 7y ago

I like it! Congrats!

ZitchDog 7y ago

I started building this last night, can't wait to try it out - hopefully I can stop building it :)

deleted 7y ago
[deleted]

ryanmaynard 7y ago

This is interesting. Any hint at what the pricing model will be? I'm not seeing anything.

drpancake 7y ago
The plan is to keep the current functionality free and add premium features for remote teams in the future.

edoceo 7y ago

Awesome, I've been doing an audio-only one (and away from Slack)

robbiemitchell 7y ago

I think about this all the time and was sad to see Sqwiggle die -- excited to see this evolve. A couple quick thoughts: - What's it like to be in two channels attempting to have a "meeting"? Seems like that will get confusing quickly. - Consider an idle state where a snapshot is posted every so often (~once/minute) until people switch to an active discussion. That way you can see who's around with way less bandwidth.

drpancake 7y ago
Yes it does allow you to open multiple channels at the same time. I don't know how useful that is, but I'd like to see how people actually use it before jumping to my own conclusions. The idle state is definitely something I'm considering for bandwidth and privacy reasons. Sqwiggle (now defunct) did this quite well. I'm also thinking about adding a way to pixelate or blur your feed while still remaining 'present'.

nottorp 7y ago

Now I get why everyone's complaining that Slack is hindering their work ;)

djsumdog 7y ago

At first I thought this was going to be a room where it always had everyone's videos and you could see all your remote workers and I was like "...creepy...and no..." I guess that could be a use case, but it's much simpler than that. Seems pretty neat.

pavel_lishin 7y ago
Something like that would be tremendously useful when you're one person who's WFH. It would be nice to take a glance at the office webcam, and see if my coworkers are actually at their desks before pinging them a question - otherwise, I'm not sure if they're about to respond, or busy away from their desk, etc.
- drpancake 7y ago
  Could you imagine using the current feature set to do this? Is there anything missing?
  - pavel_lishin 7y ago
    I think you'd have to have a dedicated machine with a camera for this; otherwise, you'd have to ask one of your coworkers to basically be constantly on-camera for you. That's not a limitation of the service, though.
drpancake 7y ago
Right, there are a number of tools like that including the (now defunct) Sqwiggle. My goal was to create something simple to fit a few use cases and see what people do with it.