Can someone explain this part of the article to me? But after that, The Washington Post's Ellen Nakashima quoted from the chat logs and included several parts

Can someone explain this part of the article to me? But after that, The Washington Post's Ellen Nakashima quoted from the chat logs and included several parts that (a) Wired had withheld but (b) were not about personal matters or national security secrets; see this analysis here of what was disclosed by the Post, Wired and others. (Nakashima and the Post refuse even to say whether they possess all the chat logs. When I asked Nakashima several months ago, she referred my inquiry to a corporate spokeswoman, who then told me: "We don't discuss the details of our newsgathering." But I focus here on Poulsen because of his central role in these events, his long-standing relationships with the key parties, and the fact that -- unlike the Post, which obviously has nothing to do with journalism -- I actually expect better of Wired). Is Greenwald saying that the Washington Post "has nothing to do with journalism"? As in, what the WaPo does is not journalism?