3 ms·
>With that reasoning, we would still be worshiping Pete Sampras. If he was still playing. Until he retired, Sampras was far and above the crowd favorite in eve
by likeabbas 7y ago
>With that reasoning, we would still be worshiping Pete Sampras.
If he was still playing. Until he retired, Sampras was far and above the crowd favorite in every match after he reached 8 slams.
>hat does not mean Nadal is not superb at what he does (his stats on returns are incredible), but it's something that's a bit harder to appreciate.
Federer's skills are far and above, but I completely disagree that it's harder to appreciate Nada's play style. I find it hard to appreciate something that comes so easy to someone like Federer, compared to Nadal who works harder than anyone else in the sport to win every single point; he's always fighting till his last breath, chasing down every ball that he can. I appreciate his determination and attitude far and above Federer's pure talent.