4 ms·
wan = outside firewall lan = inside firewall You don't want to bridge them because then it just bypasses the firewall.
by zrail 7y ago
wan = outside firewall
lan = inside firewall
You don't want to bridge them because then it just bypasses the firewall.
- cassianoleal 7y agoThat's not true. LAN traffic is still going through the router, where the firewall supposedly runs. Regardless of other devices having a public IP, if the router blocks forwarding packets (which is one of the main functionalities of a firewall), then the device(s) behind it are just as protected as if they had private IPs. It's just a bit easier to setup forwarding as it doesn't require NAT, and it's also easier to open up by accident but having a public IP does not bypass the firewall.
- jankeymeulen 7y agoDepends, a typical use case of this device would be a router, or a firewall, so the point GP makes is very much valid.
- somepig 7y agothe entire reason the devices get public a public IP is because the firewall effectively isn't there. from the time u-boot inits the topaz chip, until linux controls the chip, it behaves like a dumb ethernet switch.