Consider the complexity of bee brains, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VH9-4292H3S-J&_user=10&_coverDate=02%2F01%2F2001&_rdoc=1&_fmt=

Consider the complexity of bee brains, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VH9-4292H3S-J&_user=10&_coverDate=02%2F01%2F2001&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1590168478&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=215f9c81bf69bcc34148d26a3b42a869&searchtype=a http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi... The scientist is quite clear that the QFT connection is largely speculative. However, you've hazarded making the same kind of "nonsense" association that you are critiquing regardless of how much more "plausible" or "simpler" you think it is.