If the benefit exists, which is doubtful, it only exists for one STI and has no protective effect for the rest. > I’m really not interested in ideological batt

If the benefit exists, which is doubtful, it only exists for one STI and has no protective effect for the rest. > I’m really not interested in ideological battle here. You're defending zero-benefit mutilation of children, in the face of overwhelming medical advice. It's hard to see that as anything other than ideological.