3 ms·

How the fuck is that relevant to pre-pubescent children?

• zaroth 7y ago
  Well, it turns out the protective benefits are rather durable after the procedure is performed. Similar to the HPV vaccine which is given to 9 year olds, presumably long before they have started having sex. I’m really not interested in ideological battle here.
  • DanBC 7y ago
    If the benefit exists, which is doubtful, it only exists for one STI and has no protective effect for the rest. > I’m really not interested in ideological battle here. You're defending zero-benefit mutilation of children, in the face of overwhelming medical advice. It's hard to see that as anything other than ideological.
    • zaroth 7y ago
      I think we already agreed there’s not “zero benefit” so I fear this is no longer a productive discussion.