3 ms·
Suspicious, but if you don't trust Lamos, than it's also completely inconsequential to the truth. Evidence is only valuable if, after confirm its existence, yo
by mikedouglas 16y ago
Suspicious, but if you don't trust Lamos, than it's also completely inconsequential to the truth.
Evidence is only valuable if, after confirm its existence, your beliefs shift in some direction.
- archgoon 16y agoOne can not trust Lamos, but believe that he didn't have the foresight to work out a consistent story before sending the chat logs to Wire.
- mikedouglas 16y agoIf Lamos's story were consistent, would you be any more likely to believe it? If not, then you already have sufficient evidence that Lamos can't be trusted and you can just point to that. Evidence can't be important if, after learning it, you believe the exact same things.