2 ms·
If you forego scanning and make paper prints, OR put up with so-so scanning quality, it can be made cheap at home. Edit - a bonus with making paper prints (wit
by jacobush 7y ago
If you forego scanning and make paper prints, OR put up with so-so scanning quality, it can be made cheap at home.
Edit - a bonus with making paper prints (with an enlarger, I should also clarify) a side benefit is that photographic prints scan pretty well in ordinary documents scanners!
- acomjean 7y agoThe college paper I worked at had a darkroom and upon graduation I had a home darkroom for 4 years, stuffed into various apartment closets. Honestly it’s kinda of a pain, there is the enlarger (not cheap), the timer, chemicals (the fixer I think was somewhat nasty). Then you look at the prints after they’ve dried and you notice the dust spots. Not to mention the fact that the negative contains more dynamic range than the print, so often your dodging and burning the image to adjust. Though I miss the magic of a photo appearing on a piece of paper when printing, I kinda don’t miss a lot about the process.
- ghaff 7y agoAfter college darkrooms, I briefly setup my old home darkroom in a downstairs half-bath. It just wasn't worth it and, to tell the truth, I was probably a bit burned out on photography at that point. I continued to shoot slides on trips but it wasn't until I got into digital photography that I really fully got back into it.