3 ms·

They don't, his argument revolves more around the fact that not releasing them is exceedingly suspicious not that their release would be the savior of iron clad

• mikedouglas 16y ago
  Suspicious, but if you don't trust Lamos, than it's also completely inconsequential to the truth. Evidence is only valuable if, after confirm its existence, your beliefs shift in some direction.
  • archgoon 16y ago
    One can not trust Lamos, but believe that he didn't have the foresight to work out a consistent story before sending the chat logs to Wire.
    • mikedouglas 16y ago
      If Lamos's story were consistent, would you be any more likely to believe it? If not, then you already have sufficient evidence that Lamos can't be trusted and you can just point to that. Evidence can't be important if, after learning it, you believe the exact same things.
• jdp23 16y ago
  Agreed -- although see points by nir and me elsewhere in the thread that it's not actually suspicious that he's not releasing them.