3 ms·
Also of note though not specifically enumerated in this article, if you read the linked biography http://govsecinfo.com/events/govsec-2011/Speakers/Speaker%20Wi
by pmorici 16y ago
Also of note though not specifically enumerated in this article, if you read the linked biography http://govsecinfo.com/events/govsec-2011/Speakers/Speaker%20Window.aspx?SpeakerId={05691608-AB54-45B7-B0DE-7372D9F526F0}&ID={C18700A9-7318-4903-A591-761265B1D934} http://govsecinfo.com/events/govsec-2011/Speakers/Speaker%20... of Mark Rasch, who Salon says facilitated this whole thing, you'll notice his title is, "Director of Cybersecurity and Privacy Consulting, Computer Science Corporation".
Computer Science Corporation aka, "CSC" is a major government contractor for IT services. What better way to sell more overpriced crap to the government than to foment a climate of panic around the Wikileaks issue. A problem that CSC no doubt has the perfect multi million dollar enterprise "solution" for.
In other words Mark Rasch has a likely significant and surely direct financial interest in making news coverage about Manning as sensationalistic as humanly possible.
- geekinthecorner 16y agoYou're thinking too small. Many billions of dollars will pass through hands as a direct result of Wikileaks. Scare-mongering the government is an effective business strategy when it comes to technology.
- kvs 16y agoIt would also be interesting to see who won the DARPA CINDER: http://www.darpa.mil/sto/solicitations/sn10-68/index.html http://www.darpa.mil/sto/solicitations/sn10-68/index.html this year.
- babeKnuth 16y agoI don't follow. Why would this be interesting?