This is Wikileaks thesis that those who have influence are hiding facts to miss-lead public to a different conclusion.. Here we have 2 of the 4 and possibly 3

This is Wikileaks thesis that those who have influence are hiding facts to miss-lead public to a different conclusion.. Here we have 2 of the 4 and possibly 3 of the four being government informants driving a miss-leading conclusion of the media story and using Wired as government mouthpiece.. I submit that wikileaks will not be charged by the US government due to the corrupt miss-handling of both government informants in this case as well las the PR work the government embarked upon...there are simply too many skeletons that no-one wants to see the light of day.. And the US government has history of dropping prosecution if secrets are used as evidence in courts as they do not want them exposed...However, Manning is different case because he will be in the Military court system not the public US court system..which is unfortunate as he should be able to defend himself using whatever evidence Wired has..