From the post: > Now, there’s no question that a few specific cities have seen big rises. The Bay Area is obviously one, Denver is one, and Seattle is another—

From the post: > Now, there’s no question that a few specific cities have seen big rises. The Bay Area is obviously one, Denver is one, and Seattle is another—though the market has responded recently in Seattle and housing development is now increasing. But if you look at big cities more broadly, there’s not even a generalized urban rent crisis. The author's contention isn't simply that there's no housing crisis in places like Eastern Oregon, but rather that there's no housing crisis anywhere outside of a few major cities. He's also got a bunch of numbers to back up the assertion. Now I'm inclined to think Drum's staked out a position that is too extreme in one direction (I live in one of those major cities!) but I feel like your position is too far in the other direction. I think we want to accurately characterize the problems we're trying to solve. Here in Seattle, housing supply is a big issue. But back in my hometown of Tulsa, I suspect housing is pretty cheap, and the problem is more likely a lack of good jobs.