The issue is what is defined as "AI". From [1], some of those definitions include - Thinking Humanly - the ability to problem solve, introspection, and learnin

The issue is what is defined as "AI". From [1], some of those definitions include - Thinking Humanly - the ability to problem solve, introspection, and learning (Cognitive Science) - Thinking Rationally - the ability to perceive, reason, and act (Logic) - Acting Humanly - simply do things that (at the moment) humans do better (Turing Machines) - Acting Rationally - the design of intelligent agents (the focus of the textbook, Betty's Brain[2]) Yes, they all vaguely sound the same, but the point is, if you took the glass and had to select which definition it marks off, which would it be? My point is what about this glass makes it "intelligent"? The end of the article starts to talk about a combination of AI-glasses could form some sort of efficient image recognition process. Since we still don't have a clear definition of what intelligence is, is it simply a combination of tiny little perceptrons (from neural networks) that have specific differentiation tasks? [1] http://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/ http://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/ [2] https://wp0.vanderbilt.edu/oele/bettys-brain/ https://wp0.vanderbilt.edu/oele/bettys-brain/