4 ms·
I am not sure what point you are trying to make here. There a is difference between being an independent content distributor and being a member of the gang.
by eveningcoffee 7y ago
I am not sure what point you are trying to make here. There a is difference between being an independent content distributor and being a member of the gang.
- clintonb 7y agoNetflix has not been an independent content distributor for years. Here are their productions and co-productions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_original_programs_distributed_by_Netflix https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_original_programs_dist....
- eveningcoffee 7y agoThis is true. What I meant was "independent content distributor for not their own content". In an ideal world Netflix would not produce content and Sony would not own a movie studio.
- clintonb 7y agoWhat makes that "ideal"?
- eveningcoffee 7y agoBecause we would have more honest competition (and from that possibly better outcome for the consumer). I find that a great example is Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD where the later did not have region restrictions but the first belonged to Sony who also owned a movie studio allowing large portion of the content to be never released on HD-DVD.