14 ms·
Ah, I see. But, this is a new article about an old issue, not a link to an old article, so it shouldn't get a date in the title. That people keep rediscovering
by chaosite 7y ago
Ah, I see. But, this is a new article about an old issue, not a link to an old article, so it shouldn't get a date in the title.
That people keep rediscovering this issue and being surprised by it is says something.
- asdfasgasdgasdg 7y agoDoes it say something, though? If you have hundreds of millions of people using a product, you'll find someone surprised by any given behavior of that product. Combine that with the fact that anything even tangentially related to privacy gets bigtime upvotes on this site, and it's not hard to see how an article like this gets written about a feature that is in fact behaving as most people expect.
- adamisom 7y ago"that is in fact behaving as most people expect" Pretty subjective, what's your sample size? Oh, one? Look ,this is me being equally as dismissive and contrarian, it's not too fun is it.
- asdfasgasdgasdg 7y agoYou're entitled to your beliefs and estimations, and I'm not offended by you disagreeing with mine.
- chaosite 7y agoIf people keep being being surprised by this and writing articles about it, I think it suggests that the behavior is not being communicated clearly. And I do think that it isn't. It's reasonable behavior, and it might be expected by most people, but I still think that it is not being communicated clearly. I did expect the photos to still be gated behind an auth check, and they're not.