2 ms·
Right, there is always a rationalization.
by lonelappde 7y ago
Right, there is always a rationalization.
- kranner 7y agoActually the Buddha was the son of the chief in a fair-sized republic who had every luxury available to him. He specifically left home and began to beg for his food for the social/political purposes I mentioned. It was a huge deal for a twice-born Kshatriya lord to eat food from a lower caste person, amounting to treason against his society. If you’re interested, please read about this before making up your mind.