5 ms·
Have you stopped smoking really? To me is sounds like someone saying "I don't smoke any more, I just use cigars instead".
by KUcxrAVrtI 7y ago
Have you stopped smoking really?
To me is sounds like someone saying "I don't smoke any more, I just use cigars instead".
- stan_rogers 7y agoAs in "no longer inhaling combustion products", certainly. I'll admit it's still a damned silly thing to do... unless it's compared to sticking dead plant matter into your face-hole and setting fire to it. I started smoking at age eleven (it was perfectly legal, and I'd been buying cigarettes legally for more than half of my life by that point - it was as much a normal part of an errand as picking up a quart of milk or a loaf of bread), and can't say I put a lot of consideration into it at the time. Over then next four and a half decades, I tried quitting, unsuccessfully, dozens of times. Vaping means I haven't been inhaling burning plant matter for years. I'm happy with the harm reduction. The "quit or die" attitude is what needs to die.
- KUcxrAVrtI 7y agoI completely respect your rights to smoke whatever you feel like, and your wish for a better healthier way of doing it, or hell even suing the people who targeted you at 11, but my issue is that it hasn't been proved to my satisfaction that vaping is healthier than cigarettes. The history of smoking is one of killing people more efficiently, ecigs feel like a continuation of that great tradition.
- buildzr 7y agoAre you seriously suggesting that the removal of basically every compound in tobacco found to be cancer causing and the addition of ones with a much lower likelihood of harm that have already been in use for well over a decade is going to be more dangerous? With the exception of certain nasty flavoring agents and such, I think this is quite unlikely. There's certainly no evidence to support it.
- KUcxrAVrtI 7y agoWere they so harmless proof they they are shouldn't be hard to find. The studies I have looked at point an ambivalent picture. Unlike the case for marijuana which seems to not cause any lung cancers contrary to people looking for a link for 50 years now.
- dageshi 7y agoThere is a fairly big practical difference between cigars and cigarettes. Cigars (like pipes) aren't traditionally inhaled into the lungs, so if you have genuinely gone from cigarettes to cigars and you aren't inhaling you're probably a lot better off.
- qazpot 7y agoIt is a misconception that cigars are better than cigarettes. One cigar contains as much tobacco as 15-20 cigarettes and although you are not using lungs to breakdown and absorb smoke, you are using your mouth lining which can lead to all sorts of mouth cancers.
- acollins1331 7y agoYeah and your statistics are also misleading because who the hell smokes a full cigar in a sitting?
- dageshi 7y agoMost people actually. Most people who light a cigar will finish the entire thing.
- acollins1331 7y agoIn my experience most people will smoke a 1/3 or 1/2 of it and put it back. Then you clip the burnt part off and continue later. Maybe I only smoke around lightweights.
- dageshi 7y agoThat's very much the exception than the rule, I've smoked cigars for 5 years at this point and nobody I know who also smokes does that. Usually I pencil in between 45 minutes-2 hours to smoke a cigar depending on size.
- ppseafield 7y ago