4 ms·
It's worth checking out the response from the Bird founder: https://twitter.com/travisv https://twitter.com/travisv The Information willfully printed misleadi
by jason_JA 7y ago
It's worth checking out the response from the Bird founder:
https://twitter.com/travisv https://twitter.com/travisv
The Information willfully printed misleading information here.
https://twitter.com/travisv/status/1149763861731352577 https://twitter.com/travisv/status/1149763861731352577
I know of them doing this in a very messed up way at least once before.
They've got a business to run, but they seem to have let their "exclusive", scoop driven brand excuse their crossing of clear, ethical lines.
- makosharks 7y agoThank you so much for making a brand new account just to shill for Bird. That said, the CEO's story doesn't conflict with the article at all. The only difference is that the CEO whines 'fake news' and hopes that people won't think critically about how he's spinning.
- dmix 7y agoIt amazes me they are only 1.5yrs old.
- Cacti 7y agoThat’s an awfully strong accusation for what amounts to them not originally listing the $100mil as depreciation. That is hardly the crossing of ethnically lines, and neither your accusation nor the CEOs clever spin changes the fact that they’re still hemorrhaging money due to fundamentally poor business decisions. What is your affiliation here, considering that you created this account an hour ago solely to post this inflammatory and misleading accusation?