3 ms·
There has in fact been fuss over driver's licences, specifically as a requirement for voting. Voting is a guaranteed right of the US constitution, but there ar
by ppseafield 7y ago
There has in fact been fuss over driver's licences, specifically as a requirement for voting.
Voting is a guaranteed right of the US constitution, but there are some real barriers for some people for getting state issued ID. It's has a monetary cost, it expires, it now requires a birth certificate. If you're poor, older, or happened to have your birth hospital's or county office's records destroyed by a fire (not uncommon at all), you may not be able to get a valid, state-issued ID.
For instance, my mother was born to Irish parents with US citizenship through naturalization (granted under a law according citizenship to people who fought for the allies in WWII). When she moved to a new state and needed to renew her driver's license, it took months to get someone to accept her documents and explanation even though she had been a US citizen all her life (but born outside the country).
Whatever national ID system would be implemented, it would have to be bulletproof. Otherwise it could incidentally disenfranchise people.
- paulddraper 7y ago> Voting is a guaranteed right of the US constitution, There are some guarantees yes. But it's not universal. For example, voting eligibility is frequently denied on the basis of age and criminal history.
- ppseafield 7y agoYou're right - I misspoke. Voting eligibility is a subject with a complex history. There are many guarantees laid out in several amendments and acts. I simply meant to point out that something as conceptually simple as "just a national ID system" could have far-reaching effects such as disenfranchisement.