Any solid arguments in there are just lost with the slant. You could replace "Indian" contractors with "Floridian" contractors and you have the same problem.

Any solid arguments in there are just lost with the slant. You could replace "Indian" contractors with "Floridian" contractors and you have the same problem. It's not what they're paid (cause we all know developers are more less equal around the world - right?) it's that they are outside the company and communication adds overhead and potential for error. Using subcontractors is a hard problem for any complex endeavor. Even the best companies struggle with it.