4 ms·
The fact that you bought your own for $2500 means their business model is a failure. If you spent $2500 on Bird subscriptions and rides then that means that th
by barkingcat 7y ago
The fact that you bought your own for $2500 means their business model is a failure.
If you spent $2500 on Bird subscriptions and rides then that means that the business model is successful at least in your case.
Your comments directly prove the previous poster's thesis.
EDIT:
And yes, Bird has realized the failure in their previous business model of renting scooters, and will be SELLING scooters directly (which in my opinion is a much better business model)
https://shop.bird.co/pdp.html https://shop.bird.co/pdp.html
Alas, "Delivering in US and Europe summer 2019" means that they have lost out on $2500 worth of business from goobynight (and from the market segment represented by goobynight).
- robocat 7y ago> The fact that you bought your own for $2500 means their business model is a failure. Rubbish: they can be successful because not everyone wants to buy a scooter. Also commenter still probably uses Bird, for example one way trips or when it is just more convenient.
- goobynight 7y agoBoth of these are true. I can't believe anyone thinks that my hobbyist purchase affects the transportation business model of Bird. That's like thinking cars are putting buses out of business in Chicago. I've also rented a couple Lyft scooters out of convenience, as you said. They certainly feel worse, now that I'm spoiled, but the convenience of just dropping them off is a huge win.
- HillaryBriss 7y ago+1 yeah, I don't get that argument either. does the fact that someone bought a car mean the car rental business model is a failure? does the fact that someone bought a house mean AirBnB's business model is a failure?
- miranda_rights 7y agoYep. My use case for scooters is when the bus will take too long to get me to/from work, or running errands, or when I'm too tired/it's too far to walk. I decide that I need it at the spur of the moment, and don't want to plan to have it with me.
- DrScump 7y agorunning errands ... is exactly the kind of use case for which these shared scooters are ill-suited. You stop for your first errand, come back outside afterward, and bam! someone else took it. What if there are no others nearby?
- miranda_rights 7y agoMm, good point. My use case is usually that I'll walk up to 40 minutes 1 way if I need a cable or something like that (non perishable, semi urgent) etc, but am not willing to walk 40 minutes each way. I end up ubering otherwise.
- goobynight 7y agoMe dropping cash on a scooter was just an interesting aside. I'm one of two people in town I've seen on a personal e-scooter. Most people don't want to own. It's less useful for bar hopping and you're on the hook for maintenance/repairs/charging/storage. I'm more handy than the average person that rides these. The average person living in downtown Denver likely doesn't even own a set of tools. A rental business is much more attractive to VCs, if they can make it profitable. Has a niche retailer has ever received VC attention? Honest question. That doesn't feel like it scales like nearly on demand rentals.
- DrScump 7y agoless useful for bar hopping and you're on the hook People using motorized scooters for bar hopping (inebriated use) is a specific concern.
- goobynight 7y agoAgreed, but insert an equivalent hop without alcohol and you'll see what I mean.
- alchemism 7y agoOne can buy a scooter at home, and then still rent scooters when traveling to other cities.