2 ms·
What really bothers mr is the ad nauseum "Android 4 Eva!!!" [sic] opinions like this is that they treat Android like an homogenous product when clearly it isn't
by cletus 16y ago
What really bothers mr is the ad nauseum "Android 4 Eva!!!" [sic] opinions like this is that they treat Android like an homogenous product when clearly it isn't. The iPhone is both a brand and a product. Androi ids... A philosophy.
I've had 3 Android handsets now (HTC Desire, DroidX, Nexus S) and I still find them frustrating, inconsistent and illogical and not something I'd recommend to the non-tech savvy.
Many of the pundits don't seem to realize just how myopic their view is. Example: the ceaseless litany about how crap AT&T is and it is... In NY and SF where you'll find most of the journalists and pundits. Or just how much the simple and ubiquitous UI/UX of iOS matters to most users, far more than the ephemeral notion of an alleged "walled garden" at any rate.
The real story is that one product from one company on only one major carrier (in the US) at the very top end of the markets competes with Android at all. Don't underestimate that brand loyalty. There is an awful lot of unsatisfied demand for the iPhone that won't be realized until other carriers get it and/or the price comes down (which it slowly will).
The idea that Android allows carriers continue to screw their consumers is basically wrong. The carriers have far less power than they did 5 years ago and you can thank Steve Jobs for that. Verizon (in particular) is still kicking this dead horse but it's still a shadow of it's former self.
Fred Wilson is right: Android is good. It's really best for Google more than anyone else.
Scoble is wrong: Android won't kill the iPhone, at least not for the foreseeable future at any rate (but he is right that it is a superior product IMHO).
Predictably this post doesn't even touch on the biggest competitive advantages: the iTunes ecosystem and gaming.
So it is good we have Android to keep Apple honest but, to paraphrase, the news of iPhone's death have been greatly overexaggerated.
- riledhel 16y agoYou logic is flawed. MacBooks and mac computers have existed far long more than iPhone and their price isn't getting lower. I fail to see why the iPhone, another great premium Apple product, will drop it's price in the future.
- cletus 16y agoUm yes they have. Today you can buy a pretty good spec MBP for $1500. 4 years you'd be spending $3-4k+. The same applies to Windows laptops. I bought a 17" Dell Inspiron 9400 in 2005-06 for A$3k (actually it was a $4k spec where 2 coupons collided bringing it to about $2.8k). At that time a similar MBP was A$4.5k. This year I specced a 15" Dell for my sister for $1k. A gaming laptop is under A$2k. My 2009 13" MBP cost A$1800. The top (base) MBP is <A$3k. Macs have a gentler slope of price decreases as Apple tends to increase the (relative) spec ate the same time but it's a complete lie to say they haven't dropped price. IMHO the iPhone will be no different. In fact the first iPod Touches were more expensive than the current batch so it already has happened.