3 ms·
>> Some chess services try to check if you're playing "too perfect", but in poker that's harder to do, and there's way more money on the line. Not really. With
by icelancer 7y ago
>> Some chess services try to check if you're playing "too perfect", but in poker that's harder to do, and there's way more money on the line.
Not really. With perfect information you know the correct strict equity plays assuming normal opponents. This doesn't give you the ultimate answer, because a player's reads and inference about another player is definitely an input - especially at the highest level - but it is more than enough to give you a winning/losing player at the small/midstakes.
source: worked for an online poker company that had these tools... and far more available to us
- badfrog 7y ago> a player's reads and inference about another player is definitely an input - especially at the highest level I think player-dependent strategy is more important at lower levels because the players are much further away from what you call "normal opponents", so there's far more opportunity to exploit their mistakes.