3 ms·

It was prompted, it's just that the match for the activation phrase was incorrectly identified. That's not the same thing as the near-universally believed inte

It was prompted, it's just that the match for the activation phrase was incorrectly identified. That's not the same thing as the near-universally believed internet truism that these devices are always listening and sending recordings home.

RHSeeger 7y ago
Mr Google Developer, See here where you have it react and start phoning home when they say "Hey Google"? Right there, we're going to have you add some more terms; things like "jihad", "bomb", and a few others. We'll send you over the zip file of the full list later; it's only a few meg. Yours Truly, TLA Edit: I'm curious why the downvotes. It seems possible to me that the TLAs could have Google add more triggers for recording. If they did, we'd have no way of knowing. Sure, it's not likely, but it certainly seems possible.
- UncleMeat 7y ago
  Downvotes because the NSA isn't magic. We know how the legal boundaries of their power work from the Snowden leaks. It wouldn't be possible for them to force Google or whoever to do this.
  - RHSeeger 7y ago
    The problem is that the Snowden leaks taught us that they completely ignore their legal boundaries on a regular basis.
    - UncleMeat 7y ago
      That's not true at all. The key element of the Snowden leaks was that the legal boundaries were not where we expected them to be. The telephony metadata collection program, for example, was fully legal but has way wider impact that people considered to be right.
      - RHSeeger 7y ago
        There's some muddy water between - What the written laws allow (or don't disallow) and - What the constitution allows I would say the various TLAs have been working outside "the law" insofar as what the constitution allows.
okmokmz 7y ago
>It was prompted, it's just that the match for the activation phrase was incorrectly identified. Yes, so it recorded and sent audio when the user did not want it to. That's not any better. It'd be like if your gun went off while holstered, and you said that it was prompted to fire because the hammer hit the bullet despite the trigger not being pulled. It's very clearly not the intended functionality, so to trying to argue that that conversation recording/sending was prompted when there was no intent from the user to activate the device is a major stretch
- blueboo 7y ago
  This analogy fails with the holster — as it is an explicitly deactivated state more aptly comparable to the voice assistants being muted/off. Maybe you would be less surprised if the gun went off because you were waggling your finger inside the trigger guard rather than methodically squeezing it. The solution might be a higher trigger pressure threshold — akin to a more accurate voice trigger.

RHSeeger 7y ago

Mr Google Developer, See here where you have it react and start phoning home when they say "Hey Google"? Right there, we're going to have you add some more terms; things like "jihad", "bomb", and a few others. We'll send you over the zip file of the full list later; it's only a few meg. Yours Truly, TLA Edit: I'm curious why the downvotes. It seems possible to me that the TLAs could have Google add more triggers for recording. If they did, we'd have no way of knowing. Sure, it's not likely, but it certainly seems possible.

UncleMeat 7y ago
Downvotes because the NSA isn't magic. We know how the legal boundaries of their power work from the Snowden leaks. It wouldn't be possible for them to force Google or whoever to do this.
- RHSeeger 7y ago
  The problem is that the Snowden leaks taught us that they completely ignore their legal boundaries on a regular basis.
  - UncleMeat 7y ago
    That's not true at all. The key element of the Snowden leaks was that the legal boundaries were not where we expected them to be. The telephony metadata collection program, for example, was fully legal but has way wider impact that people considered to be right.
    - RHSeeger 7y ago
      There's some muddy water between - What the written laws allow (or don't disallow) and - What the constitution allows I would say the various TLAs have been working outside "the law" insofar as what the constitution allows.

okmokmz 7y ago

>It was prompted, it's just that the match for the activation phrase was incorrectly identified. Yes, so it recorded and sent audio when the user did not want it to. That's not any better. It'd be like if your gun went off while holstered, and you said that it was prompted to fire because the hammer hit the bullet despite the trigger not being pulled. It's very clearly not the intended functionality, so to trying to argue that that conversation recording/sending was prompted when there was no intent from the user to activate the device is a major stretch

blueboo 7y ago
This analogy fails with the holster — as it is an explicitly deactivated state more aptly comparable to the voice assistants being muted/off. Maybe you would be less surprised if the gun went off because you were waggling your finger inside the trigger guard rather than methodically squeezing it. The solution might be a higher trigger pressure threshold — akin to a more accurate voice trigger.