3 ms·
The overstatement in the headline reminds me about the article posted earlier this year in which someone rediscovered integration: http://care.diabetesjournals.
by carbocation 16y ago
The overstatement in the headline reminds me about the article posted earlier this year in which someone rediscovered integration: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/17/2/152.abstract http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/17/2/152.abstract
- gphil 16y agoThis is funny, I can't believe this made it past a peer review.
- Confusion 16y agoTo add insult to injury, the article is cited dozens of times. This is extremely disappointing and worrying. It raises a whole score of questions regarding both the intelligence, the knowledge and the moral fiber of people participating in medical research.
- shadowfox 16y agoWell. You cant really tell that without trawling through the papers themselves. For all you know many of them are refutations. (This is not the first time that someone managed to publish something awkward like that; Academics often flock to this sort of thing like sharks on a blood trail. You can get a lot of leverage by publishing early refutations)