2 ms·
To enhance point #1, you don't even need to have churn rates that change over time. Consider a very simple model where the probability of "disengaging" in a gi
by Jorge1o1 7y ago
To enhance point #1, you don't even need to have churn rates that change over time.
Consider a very simple model where the probability of "disengaging" in a given year is 50%, at which point the follower doesn't engage any more with your content (but they don't unfollow you). It doesn't matter what churn rate you pick, you still witness the same effect. And then assume that your follower count grows linearly by 1000 each year.
Time 0 1 2
Engage 1000 1500 1750
Follow 1000 2000 3000
Ratio 1 0.750 0.583
In fact, if you have a flat disengagement rate, as long as even a single person disengages without unfollowing, you will see this downward trend in engagement rates. Same assumptions as before, but this time, of the people that churn, 99% unfollow.
Time 0 1 2
Engage 1000 1500 1750
Follow 1000 1505 1762.5
Ratio 1 0.997 0.992