Except I don't think anything in the FCC ruling invalidates the sharing of inside wiring unless it's requiring the sharing of 'in-use' wiring. The FCC press re

Except I don't think anything in the FCC ruling invalidates the sharing of inside wiring unless it's requiring the sharing of 'in-use' wiring. The FCC press release states, "Agency Narrowly Pre-empts Part of a San Francisco Ordinance...The Commission preempts part of an outlier San Francisco ordinance to the extent it requires the sharing of in-use wiring in MTEs. Required sharing of in-use wiring...threatens the Commission’s framework to protect the technical integrity of cable systems for the benefit of viewers." "to the extent that it requires sharing of in-use wiring" is the key here. Notice they cite "technical integrity of cable systems for...viewers". This wording is not accident - it's because DirectTV had petitioned them to require cable companies to let them run their signal over an _in-use_ home run from a traditional cable TV company. Where are you reading that this agency ruling invalidates all of Article 52? Or specifically the part that SF requires building owners to allow residents to use a carrier of their choice? I don't see that anywhere, but maybe I missed it.