3 ms·
I think what it is, is that the FCC stalled the full vote, on the basis of the clause? >Pai's proposal said the FCC doesn't need to fully understand San Franci
by setr 7y ago
I think what it is, is that the FCC stalled the full vote, on the basis of the clause?
>Pai's proposal said the FCC doesn't need to fully understand San Francisco's law in order to preempt it.
This particularly seems like a really weird claim, and an attempt to set some kind of precedence
I'm specifically confused because I don't actually understand what powers preemption grants the FCC, but the whole story feels like a power play whose details I can't elucidate. If its not a power play, then it reads like a bunch of nonsensical behavior, which is doubtful