> I've read that the chess versions all have weak points, where if you know you are playing an AI, you can easily exploit them and win. That may have been true

> I've read that the chess versions all have weak points, where if you know you are playing an AI, you can easily exploit them and win. That may have been true in the past but it hasn't been so for more than a decade. A laptop running Stockfish handily beats top human players, even if the players know a year in advance the exact hardware and software revision they will be playing against. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human%E2%80%93computer_chess_matches#Kramnik%E2%80%93Deep_Fritz_(2006) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human%E2%80%93computer_chess_m... Kramnik, then still the World Champion, played a six-game match against the computer program Deep Fritz in Bonn, Germany from November 25 to December 5, 2006, losing 4–2 to the machine, with two losses and four draws. ... There was speculation that interest in human–computer chess competition would plummet as a result of the 2006 Kramnik–Deep Fritz match. According to McGill University computer science professor Monty Newborn, for example, "I don’t know what one could get out of it [a further match] at this point. The science is done.". The prediction appears to have come true, with no further major human–computer matches, as of 2019.