2 ms·
But in your case the second buyer has proof too. The law says they still own it even if they don't have proof and even if the first one does. Why is that necess
by mehrdadn 7y ago
But in your case the second buyer has proof too. The law says they still own it even if they don't have proof and even if the first one does. Why is that necessary?
- afiori 7y agoHe has a proof of ownership. It is just that the only way to discover that his proof is invalid if when the first owner contest it.