3 ms·
I don't have any data to back this up, but I have been watching TV for many, many years. It seems to me that we have two types of television series... 1) A sho
by cmiles74 7y ago
I don't have any data to back this up, but I have been watching TV for many, many years. It seems to me that we have two types of television series...
1) A show that was carefully written over the course of several years and had a pretty large budget when the first season of the show was finally made. These have a good first season and maybe an okay second season but often flounder in their second season.
2) A series that maybe had a good idea and a decently written pilot but not much more on the books in terms of time investment, often having a smaller budget. These shows might have a pretty poor first season with some good episodes here and there, perhaps the cast starts to show some real chemistry as their characters begin to get fleshed out towards the end of that season. The second season only gets better as everyone has a better handle on what is working.
It could be argued in both cases that more seasons are worth the gamble. In practice, though, more shows just get worse. I can't fault Netflix for leaning towards early cancellation, that seems like the obvious safe bet.
- jandrese 7y agoIt's an obvious safe bet until you cancel Firefly after one season. :(
- cmiles74 7y agoIn terms of this article, I guess the important takeaway is that happened with the traditional system, before Netflix and Amazon were making their own shows. Some networks were already leaning towards cancelling early and often.
- jonny_eh 7y agoYa, 1 fits a lot of the big expensive dramas like The Sopranos and GoT (although waited 5 seasons to flounder), while 2 fits the comedies like The Office and Parks and Rec.