Catch-22/Irony? The main problem here is that Google hired someone like this person who leaked days they were trusted to protect. It's a concern for users (Ins

Catch-22/Irony? The main problem here is that Google hired someone like this person who leaked days they were trusted to protect. It's a concern for users (Insider Risk at Google), and something we need laws to protect. Surely if Google Corporation is a poor steward of this data, the specific malicious actor here who violated both his employment policy and his users' trust is especially bad.