5 ms·
Seems like a good way to regulate escooters. Better for cities than sidewalks, better for companies than permitting the construction of infrastructure. Flexible
by elif 7y ago
Seems like a good way to regulate escooters. Better for cities than sidewalks, better for companies than permitting the construction of infrastructure. Flexible enough to adjust to demand.
- kyshoc 7y agoSanta Monica is doing something similar for escooters, and calling them "drop zones"[0]. [0]: https://la.streetsblog.org/2018/11/08/santa-monica-installs-in-street-e-scooter-parking-corrals/ https://la.streetsblog.org/2018/11/08/santa-monica-installs-...
- dole 7y agoIt's regulation, but it's kind of forcing infrastructure and government to deal with a problem when maybe the model should be that these companies are forced to rent small areas of corners, parking lots, etc. for corrals and charging, kinda like the Fotomat drive-thru camera film development, or snow cone stands. Seeing dead scooters laying in the streets here for days sucks, and while remarking the street makes sense in denser cities, it's a now semi-permanent eyesore too.
- JadeNB 7y agoI wasn't familiar with rental e-scooters before my latest visit to Ann Arbor, but now I am, because people leave them in the middle of the sidewalk. Fuck you if you're handicapped, I guess.
- Notorious_BLT 7y agoI would argue that the city should solve for this, because bikes and other small personal transport devices SHOULD have more designated secure parking. One person could park their car, or 15 people could park their scooters and bikes. In cities with good public transit, we shouldn't be allocating so much public space to people parking private vehicles.
- bobthepanda 7y agoWe don't require the same of cars. Why should we burden other modes of transportation? It's worth noting that overnight street parking was illegal in New York until 1950: https://www.nytimes.com/1996/03/17/realestate/streetscapes-cars-when-streets-were-vehicles-for-traffic-not-parking.html https://www.nytimes.com/1996/03/17/realestate/streetscapes-c...
- jessriedel 7y agoJust require a tiny amount of rent, payable to the city, for correctly parked scooters. (This would be part of the scooter registration cost.) Then, if the scooter is left outside the approved sidewalk furniture zone, the company is issued a small fine (which is easy to enforce since the scooters must be registered and labeled with a barcode) that is designed to reflect the actual tiny cost of misplaced scooters (e.g., $5/day, not punitive) and incentivize the company to find a way to get their customers to leave scooters in the correct place at a reasonably high but not perfect rate. Forcing each company to rent a million tiny places around the city from private parties is just highly inefficient. The transaction costs would be prohibitive.
- elif 7y agoSeems to still require permitting and construction
- pndpo 7y agoThat's a good idea. Especially since the solution that scooter companies seem to be going with is putting pretty useless locks on the scooters and calling it good.
- peterwwillis 7y agoAgreed. Scooters are more compact, so by building dedicated parking + charging spots, you can make them easier to find and keep charged, not to mention reducing theft. One spot could accommodate 50 scooters in a purpose-built shelf
- latestagetest 7y agoParis is doing it with 2500 parking spots for escooters: https://www.cnews.fr/france/2019-07-08/paris-les-premiers-des-2500-parkings-pour-trottinettes-crees-858611 https://www.cnews.fr/france/2019-07-08/paris-les-premiers-de...