3 ms·
What is doubly concerning here is that the contractor was in a position to demonstrate how the system worked to the reporters. That would seem to indicate they
by numbsafari 7y ago
What is doubly concerning here is that the contractor was in a position to demonstrate how the system worked to the reporters. That would seem to indicate they have access to that data in a non-secured environment.
I'm not familiar with EU law around these things, but I would imagine there is some kind of whistleblower mechanism available, and a right for authorities to audit/inspect such activities?
- C1sc0cat 7y agoI would expect that a telecoms employee who was doing similar work on quality etc to be quite securely vetted. If I was doing now what I did back in the day For BT / Dialcom (I had root on the UK's main ADMD) I would probably have to pass DV vetting (TS in USA terms)
- dmix 7y agoWhat about all the telecom APIs like Twilio? They have raw access to millions of phone calls every day. I doubt they have ‘secure rooms’ for debugging.
- MattLeBlanc001 7y agoIsn't he in breach of GDPR requirements?
- rando444 7y agoI can guarantee you that 99% of every company that has a copy of your PII has employees that can connect to work resources via VPN.