3 ms·
The solution is probably to have the state or child-raising corporations pay people to have children instead of the current model where 1-2 parents raise a chil
by devit 7y ago
The solution is probably to have the state or child-raising corporations pay people to have children instead of the current model where 1-2 parents raise a child.
Not having children at all and intentionally extinguishing humans is also a possibly optimal, albeit more radical, solution.
- ovi256 7y agoSince the demographic transition started (first in France, after the French revolution) humans have been selected for resistance to anti-natalist ideas. Literally only people with some resistance to them perpetuate their genes! Empirical proof can be seen in the ever-increasing proportion of large families. Natural selection is hard at work picking the exact opposite of what anti-natalists want.
- devit 7y agoYes, obviously, hence the idea to make childbirth something that is done because the person is paid by the state or a corporation, so that the genes that are spread are not related to the willingness to raise a child.